Zurich · Cross-border mandates · Private & institutional clients EN DE
   
ForumsCH · DE · UK · EU
TargetsNetwork-wide
ProcedureParallel filings
Local counselVetted, coordinated
ReportingMonthly written

Global legal action against online trading fraud networks

The whole structure is the defendant

Most schemes involve complex corporate structures spread across several jurisdictions. Targeting only the front-end platform leaves the operating network intact, and the assets out of reach.

International Forex fraud organisations rarely operate from a single country. Most schemes involve complex corporate structures spread across several jurisdictions. One entity may control the website, another may process client deposits, while separate companies handle crypto conversions, call-centre operations, and offshore banking.

Litigation strategy is designed accordingly, multiple defendants, multiple forums, sequenced so that procedural moves in one jurisdiction support disclosure or enforcement in another.

Cross-discipline coordination

Our firm works with

A litigation strategy this layered demands the right specialists at each step.

International litigation counsel
Financial-crime specialists
Cybersecurity investigators
Blockchain forensic experts
AML consultants
Regulatory advisors

We pursue legal strategies against:

  • Platform operators
  • Corporate directors
  • Beneficial owners
  • Payment intermediaries
  • Fraudulent introducing brokers
  • Shell corporations
  • Individuals involved in fund movement and laundering

Illustrative case examples

Anonymised litigation matters by approximate value

Generalised examples that reflect the types of multi-jurisdictional litigation we coordinate. Past outcomes are not predictive of future results.

€132,500Case example

A platform operating under a falsified regulatory license was connected to multiple offshore payment channels.

License fraud · Offshore
€249,700Case example

Legal proceedings targeted intermediaries facilitating suspicious high-volume crypto transfers.

Intermediary action
€372,200Case example

Digital evidence linked multiple account managers operating from different jurisdictions to the same fraud structure.

Personnel mapping
€526,800Case example

Technical infrastructure analysis revealed connections between several fraudulent trading domains.

Infra · Domain cluster
€689,300Case example

International legal teams coordinated evidence collection involving offshore banking records.

Banking disclosure
€867,900Case example

A multi-jurisdictional investigation exposed shell companies used to route investor deposits.

Shell-company chain
€1,041,600Case example

Cyber-forensic analysis uncovered centralised CRM systems used to manage investor communications.

CRM · Comms layer
€1,463,200Case example

Financial intelligence specialists identified coordinated laundering activity through multiple exchanges.

Laundering pattern
$1,683,000Case example

A large international fraud network operating in the Forex and Crypto sectors became the subject of coordinated investigative and legal measures across several countries.

Network-wide action
Disclaimer. All case examples above are anonymised illustrative scenarios. Amounts, jurisdictions, and operational details have been generalised. Past outcomes are not predictive of future results; every matter depends on its own facts and applicable law.

Next step

A serious matter deserves a serious litigation plan, written before the first filing.

If you are weighing how to proceed against a multi-jurisdictional scheme, an orientation call will set out the realistic forums, the likely sequencing, and the cost envelope.